Sean "Diddy" Combs & Daughters For L'Uomo Vogue's Music Issue

Sean “Diddy” Combs posed for the October cover of L’Uomo Vogue’s music issue with his twin daughters, D’Lila Star and Jessie James (they turn 2 in December). Cute!


  1. jenna says

    they are cute.but they should be in a nice outfit. i wonder what their going to think when they are older and see these pictures.hmm?

  2. 2teens says

    Hey Kx5! Do you have your new baby-loves at home with you yet? I would be bouncing off the walls with excitement if it was me. 🙂

  3. 2teens says

    Many of the old-timers here on babyrazzi know that is a taboo word. If you use it in a post you’ll be moderated. I also have been moderated in the past for other words which I could never figure out. But today I cracked the code! Any word that has the letters a.p.e in it will get you moderated. That includes common words like shap.e, newspa.per, etc. It was the word chap.el that finally made me realize what was going on.
    Try it and you’ll see. Just type one ap.e word and hit submit.

  4. RachieUK says

    i just think there’s absolutely no reason for the children to be naked. THATS the problem. other than that, it looks ok…but the picture becomes something totally different, especially with the cheap bows around their necks.

  5. Renee says

    Better yet after a second look, I don’t think it is appripriate at all. Maybe if he took it to hang in his own house or something, but a magazine. Nope don’t like it.

  6. Renee says

    I do not think this picture is appriopriate for the cover of a mens magazine. Maybe a parent magazine.

  7. 2teens says

    FYI, don’t ever try to post the word c h a p e l on babyrazzi, you’ll be moderated.
    I had to type my above message 3 times before I figured out it was because of the word c h a p e l. Go figure!

  8. 2teens says

    I can’t believe some people actually think this is porn. Photography is ART and artists have painted and sculpted the nude human form for centuries. How about the statue of David? Is that porn? What about all of the chubby na ked babies painted on the Sistine cha pel?
    And to insinuate that this shouldn’t be in a men’s magazine because “all they will find are perverted eyes” as #18 put it… is pretty insulting to men. Most of the men out there are good and decent people, fathers, husbands. I seriously doubt any pedophile would even buy a men’s fashion magazine.

  9. Lauren says

    I don’t see what’s so wrong about this picture. Yeah, it seems strange since the girls are only 2 but it’s supposed to come off artistic.

  10. Dnice says

    I am not going to go as far to say I think the picture is pornographic, but there is something about it that is just not right. Not artistically – not in the positioning. The way Diddy is sitting with them seems distant and akward. Not at all warm. I would have loved to see a black and white of him playing with them in their natural state. It actually looks very cheap.

  11. stephanie says

    it is just wrong, it looks wrong, it looks weird and he needs to pay to get this picture re-taken and buy up all the copies already printed. IT JUST MAKES NO DARN SENSE!

  12. RW says

    They look like Chippendale’s dancers. It’s inappropriate and draws needless attention to these little girls. People wonder why there are perverts out there when parents are giving them the bait and the temptation. It’s ridiculous!

  13. aLBO says

    Its a good pic, but i think the babies would be better in a mono chrome outfit like their dad, not sure naked is quite the right way to go with babies on a mens mag.

  14. 2teens says

    #21 Niloofar, I am entitled to my opinion and yes… I think naked babies are beautiful. I do not see pornography when I see a naked baby. Nudity does NOT equal sex. I see two beautiful babies and you see “creepy kids”, but hey, you’re entitled to your opinion too.

  15. oriana says

    I doubt that Kim has much say so about anything, he is the one with money controlling the purse strings, not her. I am sure he gets his way about everything when it comes to the kids, all of them.

  16. littlemisscaliope says

    If this picture were in a parenting magazine it would seem appropriate but this is a MEN’S magazine. As several people have said, there are far too many perverts in this world who would see this in a different way. A naked baby is beautiful but there’s a time and a place for that.

  17. ELIE TAYLOR says

    Find it odd that he would put his twin daughters in a photo
    where was Kim.. Did she allow him to do this..??

  18. memphislis says

    I think white silk would have been perfect too. Isn’t he the one that has a thing about all white?

  19. L.Lodhi says

    maybe some people on here dont see it in any other way but unfortunatly we live in a world where there are weirdo’s and people that like looking at kids. He should of acted like a dad and kept his childrens bodies covered up.

  20. RachieUK says

    I dont know about anyone else, but i am just slightly disturbed by this picture. obviously, it wouldnt have been meant in a disturbing way at all, and im sure he’s a really good dad and everything before anyone has a go at me! but there’s just something about this photo thats a bit odd…the way he’s leaning or what he’s wearing, i dont know. But it wouldn’t look out of place for there to be a woman sitting there or something…and then the fact that the babies arent wearing anything, makes it just a tad worse! just a thought but thats my opinion anyway!

  21. oriana says

    Oh for Heaven’s sakes people! This is not creepy and it is nowhere near porno unless someone with a creepy mind is thinking that way. I don’t see cuteness at all but there is nothing wrong with pictures of naked babies, they are with their father!

    All the perverts, look away!

  22. says


    C’mon!! What is wrong with a naked baby? They are adorable!
    The bowties are a little odd, but I can tell they were going for a “sassy” or “cool” theme….. NOT creepy. I feel sorry for anyone who sees “porn” in this picture.

    “What is wrong with a naked baby?” nothing if they are at home where they can be protected from perverted eyes which is all they will find in a men’s magazine. you would think that as a father he would try and protect his baby girls instead of this…….whatever it is. they might be adorable but they most postivly should not be naked in a magazine shoot. and i agree with “Ruby Jackson ‘What’s the saying… it’s hard to define pornography, but you know it when you see it. This is creepy.’

  23. Julia says

    I have to say that already at first glance this picture feels inappropriate, particularly since it is for Mens Vogue…
    They are just such beautiful babies. They should be protected from the preying eyes in the world. Put some dresses on the babies!

  24. 2teens says

    C’mon!! What is wrong with a naked baby? They are adorable!
    The bowties are a little odd, but I can tell they were going for a “sassy” or “cool” theme….. NOT creepy. I feel sorry for anyone who sees “porn” in this picture.

  25. Ruby Jackson says

    What’s the saying… it’s hard to define pornography, but you know it when you see it. This is creepy.

  26. Macy says

    I do not like this picture. They would have been so much cuter dressed in something beautiful. This is weird to me.

  27. Lily says

    They ARE beautiful babies; they can’t help it with a mother like Kim Porter…..what is Daddy thinking posing them with the same kind of bow-ties that Playboy bunnies wear… and in the nude? Babies love to run around the house precious and bare naked at home, but they look terribly uncomfortable. For a man who aspires to “class,” Daddy should have dressed his precious babes in white silk, not pre-porn.

  28. mommy-of-two-girls says

    i like the darkness of the picture and the girls are cute. BUT, i don’t find it appropriate to have 2 year old kids naked for a photo shoot.

  29. oriana says

    I wish I could say these babies are cute but I can’t, they are very blessed though to have parents that really love them and can support them.

  30. Bebe says

    Cute pictures, but where is Chance Combs??? I think he should involve her in the photo shoot as well…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.