Katie Holmes Brings Suri To The Set Of 'Mad Money'

Katie Holmes & Tom Cruise
Katie Holmes brought Suri to the set of “Mad Money” on Wednesday. Suri is so cute!

Source

Comments

  1. Izzie says

    Some of you guys are harsh. I would be crushed to hear somebody speaking of my child that way. Whether it was a birthmark or not, she’s a beautiful child. And how can you even say a baby looks vacant. Their babies! How can they look vacant…maybe she just woke up or maybe she’s scared w/ all the camera’s and lights. Come on guys grow up and think about if it was your child. Let’s not act 14 and talk bad about children , please. I find it pathetic.

  2. libraesque says

    LOLA…you’re SICK…calling a baby “hot”
    what the fuck is WRONG with you???

    her “height”???????
    you mean the fact that she looks her ACTUAL age of 16 months rather than 13??????

  3. Shadow Girl says

    Haha, KH should have used condoms. Suri should be the poster child for protection. ” USE YOUR FUCKING BRAINS AND GET BIRTH CONTROL….OR ELSE YOU COULD BE ALIEN SPAWN AS WELL!”

    Hey, some people I truly wonder if they ARE from outer space.

  4. cherisse says

    she is soooo cute. Not only that but if you go on katie’s website @ katieholmespictures.com they have more pictures of Suri and a video.

  5. Jackie says

    What kind of catwalk Lola? – one for dwarves?
    Your comment is just ridiculous…what the hell can you tell from her height?? She doesn’t appear to have grown much taller at all in the past six months!

  6. Anne says

    #27, WOW you sound fucking PSYCHOTIC!!!!

    get some help
    daydreaming about a celebrity baby and what they’ll become when they’re older is SO abnormal

  7. EveLina says

    I just can’t get over the fact on how much she and my daughter look so much a like…

    It leaves me soo SPEECHLESS!

  8. Shadow Girl says

    Why can’t you girls get offline and go fucking to make babies of your own, hmm? Quit being a cum spitter and get knocked up. Suri’s an alien spawn, anyone w/half a brain knows it.

  9. me says

    omg she is adorable….she gets cuter every picture…i do think she looks alot diffrent than in vanity fair….she had very striking features -dark brow hair…bright blue eyes….very pale. now her hair seems lighter…she’s gotten a tan…and well she has obviously gottin bigger. i however prefered her hair when she was in the vanity fair pictures.

  10. EILEEN says

    Suri is my favourite celebrity baby. Dannielynn is cute but Suri is absolutely beautiful and will be a looker.

  11. K says

    I think Suri has never looked cuter and I don’t care what any one says. If she was mine, I would put all sorts of ribbons in her hair. I have also not seen a birthmark on her in sometime so I don’t think there was one or if it was a parmanent one. She is just a doll.

  12. says

    —————————–
    This is what an ex scientologist had to say about ppl like JACKIE

    ___________
    ______

    I see some of my former friends from the Church using their time-honored persecution technique claiming that everyone is out to get them and the church.

    Those who are wondering if there is an active effort to post comments and spread links favorable to the church, why of course there is. As an ex-member, I used to be involved in just such activity. It’s not as if members are sitting in a room typing comments all day long at some church somewhere. Instead, action alerts are sent out in e-mail and on private websites with links to suspect websites and articles like this one, and members are encouraged to visit and file Knowledge Reports detailing the negative comments, including any identifying information about who made them, and also attaching their responses. This information is then stored in electronic databases for future reference and tracking purposes.

    It is also incorrect to say that new members are not exposed to tech straight away upon entry into the organization. From the earliest moments of involvement in the church, tech is taught. I’ve included a link which shows exactly what early members are exposed to which will be absolutely familiar to anyone, right down to OT-0.

    I left the Church in 2001 after I was pressured to disconnect my family. A close friend of mine who left a year earlier was deemed an SP (the church’s blacklist) and his life was made a living hell. I quit when I started doing research on the Internet and started getting answers to questions I had been putting in the back of my mind. The Lisa McPherson Trust helped me tremendously.

    The media and the Internet are incredibly dangerous for the Church because they let members privately explore their own doubts and questions outside of the control of the Church. An incredible amount of time and money is spent on restricting this information because it threatens the viability of the entire organization, should enough people follow my footsteps.

    I don’t blame my friends still in the Church for their beliefs. You don’t know just how effective group persuasion and tech methods can be. For those outside of the Church, the cause for skepticism is as plain as day, but for those within, attacking them for their beliefs threatens their self-worth, and people will try to defend that for a long time.

    Sc!entol0gy attacks psychiatry, which is ironic, because so many of their techniques of manipulation were tested and found effective by that same field!

    But for critics of the church, please don’t attack Sc!entologist followers for their beliefs — help show them there is a way out to a world that waits to welcome them back with open and accepting arms. That is what ultimately worked for me and I could not be happier. You cannot lead someone away from Sc!entology through name-calling.

    Posted by: Ex-Member | May 17, 2007 01:21 PM

  13. says

    This is what an ex scientologist had to say about ppl like JACKIE

    ___________
    ______

    I see some of my former friends from the Church using their time-honored persecution technique claiming that everyone is out to get them and the church.

    Those who are wondering if there is an active effort to post comments and spread links favorable to the church, why of course there is. As an ex-member, I used to be involved in just such activity. It’s not as if members are sitting in a room typing comments all day long at some church somewhere. Instead, action alerts are sent out in e-mail and on private websites with links to suspect websites and articles like this one, and members are encouraged to visit and file Knowledge Reports detailing the negative comments, including any identifying information about who made them, and also attaching their responses. This information is then stored in electronic databases for future reference and tracking purposes.

    It is also incorrect to say that new members are not exposed to tech straight away upon entry into the organization. From the earliest moments of involvement in the church, tech is taught. I’ve included a link which shows exactly what early members are exposed to which will be absolutely familiar to anyone, right down to OT-0.

    I left the Church in 2001 after I was pressured to disconnect my family. A close friend of mine who left a year earlier was deemed an SP (the church’s blacklist) and his life was made a living hell. I quit when I started doing research on the Internet and started getting answers to questions I had been putting in the back of my mind. The Lisa McPherson Trust helped me tremendously.

    The media and the Internet are incredibly dangerous for the Church because they let members privately explore their own doubts and questions outside of the control of the Church. An incredible amount of time and money is spent on restricting this information because it threatens the viability of the entire organization, should enough people follow my footsteps.

    I don’t blame my friends still in the Church for their beliefs. You don’t know just how effective group persuasion and tech methods can be. For those outside of the Church, the cause for skepticism is as plain as day, but for those within, attacking them for their beliefs threatens their self-worth, and people will try to defend that for a long time.

    Sc!entol0gy attacks psychiatry, which is ironic, because so many of their techniques of manipulation were tested and found effective by that same field!

    But for critics of the church, please don’t attack Sc!entologist followers for their beliefs — help show them there is a way out to a world that waits to welcome them back with open and accepting arms. That is what ultimately worked for me and I could not be happier. You cannot lead someone away from Sc!entology through name-calling.

    Posted by: Ex-Member | May 17, 2007 01:21 PM

  14. says

    TO ALL THE POSTERS:

    JACKKIE (1) IS A CLAM

    She is only here to file reports for the scientologist

    She tried to gain access to peoples emails and when people started getting angry she run off from the board

    She has a habit of accusing other bloggers on here so you will give her personal information about yourself when she challenges you about using a different ID

    IGNORE HER..and Jackie , the new lady, I suggest you change your name so ppl dont confuse the two of you, because the other one is nasty …….

    Enjoy your blogging

  15. Jackie says

    Jackie 1 – what are you talking about?? I never posted ANY link…please get your facts right…

    Granny, I too think it is a stork mark, and think it will fade in time.

    I think it is horrific that as parents, they would be so ashamed of a mark like that that they would get it airbrushed out of photographs – I am not saying that they did/have, I am just saying that IF they did, it isn’t nice.

  16. oriana says

    Dannielynn is the most beautiful baby! Suri was definately cuter when she was younger.

    Dear Lord, if she looks more and more like Tom when she gets older, with his honker, well, Dear Lord!!!!

  17. oriana says

    Believe me, I have told everyone in my family, my husband’s family, and everyone on my whole block all about the Scientol, Miss Kelly Make Me Want to Puke Kelly Preston, John and Tom, they in turn all telling everyone they know, and all are in stunned amazement and shock over what they have read!!!

  18. Shadow Girl says

    Suri is L Ron Hubbard reincarnated! DOn’t you weirdos(‘cept Oriana) ever do research. There is no birthmark, Jackie’s just demonstrating her ignorance yet again. It really makes me laugh because she doesn’t know what the fuck she talks about.

    HAHAHA, JACKIE! Better to let people think you’re an asskissing piece of shit then to type out what you ‘feel’ and remove all doubt!

  19. oriana says

    Xena, where are you? Are you looking at this cute picture?

    Put your clothes on, get out of the backyard and come in the house!!!!! This is really a cute picture of her!

    I saw Tom on the other site, he looks young to me, I think this marriage is definately agreeing with him and he is so happy with this little girl!!!!

    Nicki, I always thought Suri looks just like Tom, but this picture I actually think she favors Katie also.

  20. Nicki says

    I think this is the best pic of Suri I have seen. That vacant stare, if you could see the whole pic is a little boy in front of them who seems to be talking to ??Katie, or Suri or both? But in a full pic you can clearly see him.
    Maybe she is just sizing him up, or probably trying to understand the Louisiana accent:lol: It took me a few weeks to understand some of the words when I first moved there.
    I hated the cover of Vanity Fair, she looked strange. ALL the pics inside were cute. I really love this one of her, I think she looks exactly like Katie.

  21. Julie Ann says

    Suri’s birthmark on her head just matches the one Katie has on her arse thats the size of California. The kid isn’t so cute these days. Sure hope she doesn’t get the beak her clown of a dad has.

  22. N says

    I think Suri is Beautiful… It may have been a raspberry. : ) I see there is another N posting….. : )

  23. Jenna M. (UK) says

    If she does have a birthmark and the Cruises asked for it to be airbrushed out I have just lost any respect I had for them. My baby sister (same age as Suri) has a birthmark on her head and neck and my family would NEVER dream of hiding it like we were ashamed of it.

  24. oriana says

    I do have to say that mark did look pretty low on her face, it was definately not high up on her forehead.

    I will look at the other link, never checked it before now.

  25. Alice says

    Mark my words, one day Suri is going to be a very important person, and don’t say I didn’t tell you.

  26. N says

    I didn’t think it was possible but Suri just got cuter! Katie looks beautiful and haooy too in these pictures.

  27. Gina says

    I cartainly have not seen a mark on her face since those wedding pics and if we could see it with her bangs then, then I think we would be seeing it now. That part of her face is rather low and the hair cannot hide it. Quit finding fault with her, she is a beautiful baby. Give her a break.

  28. Jackie (1) says

    That was not a birth mark, that was a mark she had for one day and we have not seen it since even when her hair is not in covering that part of her forehead. Suri is definitely beautiful. Am actually a fan of hers because I believe she is destined to be something great some day and I don’t think she will fade away like other celebrity babies.

    As for saying she has a vacant look, I think it is just the opposite. She is one baby who never looks like she does not know what is going on around her. Infact I thought that that was part of the reason she is called older because she has a fierced focused look.

    Oriana, the link Jackie sent from celebitchy deliberately darkened the mark on Suri’s face because people on that site hate Tomkat but if you visit Katieholmes.com, you cah see her forehead and apart from the day of the pre wedding party, she has not had that mark. Why would they hide a mark that low with hair?

    Check out pictures on this site when she is wearing the green dress and you will notice that she does not have the mark.

  29. oriana says

    Jackie, I do see it now, you are right!! It appears to be kind of big to me, I don’t know if that will fade away or not? I hope so, but she is the cutest thing! I love her with her bangs!

    Do magazines just automatically airbrush on their own? Is that their policy? Or do the subjects and parents request it to be done?

    Yvonne, Yes, the story about the missing little girl is also in People magazine and on the front cover too! I really admire the celebs that are aware and are touched by this tragic case.

  30. oriana says

    I am still looking for pictures with the birth mark!

    Oh, I love babies with lots of hair, they are so cute!!!! Especially when they get older and have natural curly waves, just darling!!!!! Love them!

    I think this baby is just one of the cutest, and was definately probably startled by the cameras, love her litte dress too!

  31. cw says

    I think it looks like a stork bite too. My daughter was born with one on the back of her neck, right at the hairline. The pediatrician said she will always have it. But I’ve heard that stork bites on other parts of the face usually do fade away.

  32. Granny says

    The picture with the “so called birthmark” looks like a discoloration my grandmother used to call if I remember right an “angel’s kiss”. I believe the same mark on the back of the neck was called a “stork’s kiss”? If it is one of those, they are common and just fade away.

  33. DMITZ says

    Oriana – she did when she was born, but now she’s got curls (got them from my husband). She had so much hair (like Suri) that I cut it before she was 4 mo old!! LOL. My hubby said that’s the reason it curled, but I don’t think so? I like her curls – they are the soft relaxed kind. When people used to say Suri was older and TomKat was lying about her age b/c of her hair it would irriatate me b/c my baby was like that too (and younger than Suri). Most hispanics (at least from what I’ve seen) are born w/a lot of hair.

  34. says

    Fgs, dont argue! Birthmark or not, she is such an absolute cutie! Absolutely adorable and a complete treasure! And to be honest, she doesnt look that vacant to me, I think shes wondering what the heck is going on with all these twits around her!

  35. Jackie says

    I am telling you all, there IS a birthmark…it was airbrushed outta the vanity fair pics, though you can see it in the wedding ones…
    I think it is the type that will fade with age….though they have definately tried to hide it…unsuccessfully…they used airbrushing and make up…
    look at papparazzi pics and you see it..
    the thing is, it’s no big deal, lots of beautiful babies have these and they fade and go…
    as for her ‘vacant’ expression, yes carleigh, perhaps she had just woken or was shocked by the glare of the bulbs…whatever..it doesn’t take away from the fact that she looks VACANT in this pic…I wasn’t being nasty or mean, god, that is a little innocent girl here, she just DOES look vacant to me here…don’t try to start any of that petty argument crap with me ok??!!! i won’t play..

  36. DMITZ says

    I think one of my facinations w/Suri is that she reminds me a LOT of my daugther – or at least she did when she was younger. Now they don’t really look alike. My daughter is 1 mo younger than Suri, but when Suri’s pic finally came out, everyone kept calling my baby Suri. It was kinda cute. When she came on EXTRA, even my son goes, “Mommy, it’s my sister on TV!!”

  37. Fifi says

    I don’t think shes as cute as she used to be…in Vanity Fair I thought she was adorable but now shes kind of lost some of her cuteness, maybe its just cause she looks so messy, I don’t know

  38. oriana says

    I have looked at pictures looking for a birth mark, I don’t see it! Sometimes a baby’s hair is so “fine” that a barrette won’t stay in place, I think she is adorable and I like her hair, I do think she was much cuter when she was smaller but she is a beautiful child, I do think she looks just like Tom and I hope she doesn’t have his “SNOUT” when she gets older!

    Gorgeous little girl!!!!!!

  39. Lauren says

    Suri is soooooo cute!! Shiloh and Suri are the 2 cutest celeb baby girls. Suri looks soo much like Tom!

  40. Kalista Brat says

    Yay, but this pic wasn’t that much good quality I have to see a better pic of her. I still can’t get enough of this baby! I wanna see more more more! Please tomkat let us see Suri again soon!

  41. carleigh says

    Jackie where in the world do you get the information that Suri has a birthmark??? There have been several pictures of her and there was no birthmark present on her forehead.
    As far as having the vacant look, maybe she just woke up from a nap and is in that baby daze phase or maybe she’s in shock from all the camera’s and paparazzi around???
    Either way Suri is a beauty and I love seeing pictures of her, she’s completely adorable.

  42. Bethany says

    This is a cute picture. Suri is a cutie, and Katie has a silly look on her face. She’s not being as fake or uptight as you see her sometimes. I know that when my daughters were Suri’s age, they wouldn’t keep a barette or clippie in their hair, no matter how many times I fixed it. So maybe her hair does get fixed, but she takes it out.

  43. Sandra says

    And how does one look present in a picture? I don’t think she is the cutest, she looks too much like Tom ;o(

  44. Jackie says

    She has her hair like that to cover the birthmark on her forehead, everyone knows that!
    She looks vacant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.